ATTACHING NOSE TO THE PLACE OF PROSTRATION COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SYĀFI‘Ī AND ḤANBALĪ SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT
Main Article Content
Abstract
The government has implemented health protocols to limit the spread of Covid-19, including wearing masks. However, problems arise when wearing a mask while praying. According to the Ḥanbalī school of thought, this prayer is invalid. On the other hand, according to the ulemas of the al-Syafi'ī school, prayers are still valid even if a mask is covered the nose. The author is interested in examining the opinions and methods of these two schools with a comparative legal approach. The authors found that most ulemas of Ḥanbalī schools stated that the nose is a part of the body that must be attached to the place of prostration in prayer. The ulemas of the al-Syafi'i school state that only the forehead must touch the place of prostration, while the nose is only a suggestion. The ulemas of both schools use linguistic (lughawiyyah) and causation (ta‘līl) methods, but the results are different. It happens because of differences in the editorial hadith used as a source of law. The author concludes that the ulemas of these two schools have such tendencies about different editors' hadiths choosing.
Article Details
References
‘Abd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Ṭayyār. Wabal Al-Ghamamah Fī Syarḥ Umdah Al-Fiqh Li Ibn Qudāmah. Saudi Arabia: Dār al-Waṭan, 2011.
Abū Isḥāq al-Syiīazī. Al-Muhażżab Fī Fiqh Al-Imām Al-SyāfiĪ. Damaskus: Dār al-Qalam, 1996.
Abubakar, Al Yasa’. Metode Istislahiah: Pemanfaatan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.
Al-Asyuṭī, Muṣṭafā ibn Sa‘d ibn ‘Abduh. Maṭālib Ūlī Al-Nuhā Fī Syarḥ Al-Ghāyah Al-Muntahā Fī Fiqh Al-Ḥanbalī. Beirut: Dar al-Kutib al-‘ilmiyah, 1971.
Al-Dāruqutnī. Sunan Al-Dāruqutnī. Beirut: Mū’assasah al-Risālah, 2004.
Al-Ghazālī. Al-Wajīz. Jakarta: Dar al-Kutib al-‘ilmiyah, 2004.
Al-Jaziri, Abdurraḥman. Al-Fiqh Ala Al-Mażahib Al-Arba’ah. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2015.
Al-Juwaynī, Abd al-Mālik ibn Abd ‘Allāh ibn Yūsuf. Nihāyah Al-Maṭlab Fi Dirāyah Al-Mażhab. Jeddah: Dar Al-Minhāj, 2007.
Al-Malibarī, Zayn al-Dīn ibn ‘Abd al’Azīz. Fatḥ Al-Muīin. Surabaya: al-Hidayah, 2006.
Al-Nawawī, Muḥy al-Dīn ibn Syarf. Rawḍah Al-Ṭālibīn. Riyad: Dār ‘Ālam al-Kutub, 2003.
Al-Nawawi, Muhyiddin bin Syarf. Majmu’ Syarh Al-Muhazzab. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam, 2009.
Al-Ramlī, Syihāb al-Dīn. Nihāyah Al-Muhtāj. Beirut: Dar al-Kutib al-‘ilmiyah, 2004.
Al-Yamanī, Abū al-Ḥusayn Yaḥyā ibn Abī al-Khayr Iibn Salīm al-‘Imrānī al-Syāfi‘ī. Al-Bayān Fī Mażhab Al-Imām Al-Syāfi‘Ī. Riyad: Dar Al-Minhāj, 2011.
Al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuh. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2011.
Al-Zuhaylī, Muḥammad. Al-Qawā‘id Al-Fiqhiyyah. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2008.
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif; Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. 3th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
Ibn ‘Aqīl. Al-Tażkirah Fī Al-Fiqh ‘alā Mażhab Al-Imām Aḥmad Bin Muḥammad Bin Ḥanbal. Riyad: Dār Isybīliyā, 2001.
Ibnu Qayyim al-Jauziyyah. Zadul Ma’ad: Panduan Lengkap Meraih Kebahagiaan Dunia Akhirat. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2008.
Ibnu Rusyd. Bidayah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihayah Al-Muqtasid. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2015.
Ibrahim, Muslim. Pengantar Fiqh Muqaran. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1989.
Qudāmah, Ibn. Al-Mughnī Syarḥ Al-Kabīr. Riyad: Dār ‘Ālam al-Kutub, 1997.
Rukajat, Ajat. Penelitian Pendekatan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama, 2018.
Sabil, Jabbar. Menalar Hukum Tuhan: Akar Penalaran Ta’lili Dalam Pemikiran Imam Al-Ghazali. Banda Aceh: LKaS, 2009. http://www.jabbarsabil.com/p/buku.html.
Syams al-Dīn ibn Muḥammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Zarkasyī. Syarḥ Al-Kabīr ‘alā Mukhtaṣar Al-Kharaqī. Riyad: Maktabah, 1993.
Syarīf al-Din Mūsā al-Hujawī al-Maqdisī. Al-Iqnā’ Fī Fiqh Al-Imām Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1998.