The Decline of Local Political Parties in Post-Conflict Aceh: A Qualitative Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Aceh peace process has been ongoing for nearly two decades. Some studies note that an essential aspect contributing to the Aceh peace context is the presence of local political parties in the post-peace era. This article aims to describe the declining existence of local political parties in the political life of Aceh society. This study employs a qualitative method, with primary data obtained from interviews and secondary data gathered from relevant literature reviews. The study reveals that local political parties in post-conflict Aceh have essentially gone through three of the four phases and are beginning to enter the fourth. The first phase is the formation of local political parties, the second is their rise, and the third is their victory in Aceh's political contestation. The fourth phase is decline or reduction, characterized by local parties being abandoned by their supporters. This research identifies several factors indicating the current existence of local political parties in the decline phase: 1) Loss of public trust; 2) Pessimism among political actors; 3) Weak party integrity and human resources; 4) Unprofessional organizational management; and 5) Internal conflicts within the party. These factors are not independent but are interconnected with one another.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Creswell, J. W. 2018. Research and Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Creswell, John W. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset, Memilih Antara Lima Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Daud, Muhammad, Usman, and Irwan Safwadi. 2018. “Dinamika Politik Partai Lokal Dan Nasional Pada Pemilukada Di Aceh, Tahun 2017.” Jurnal Humaniora 2(1):29–38.
Husaini M. Hasan, and Husaini Hasan. 2015. Dari Rimba Aceh Ke Stockholm. Jakarta: Batavia Publishing.
Ikramatoun, Siti. 2014. “Institusi Kepemimpinan Adat Aceh: Peran Wali Nanggroe Dan Respon Masyarakat .” Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Ikramatoun, Siti, Firdaus Mirza Nusuary, and Khairul Amin. 2019. “GAM and Social Transformation, from A Rebellion into A Political Movement.” Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018). doi: 10.2991/agc-18.2019.35.
Ilham, Iromi. 2015. “Aceh Dalam Kuasa Awak Nanggroe (Studi Kemunculan Elit Baru Dari Kalangan Mantan Pejuang GAM Pasca Penandatanganan Nota Kesepahaman MoU Helsinki).” Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict. 2015. Political Power Struggles in Aceh.
Kadir, M. Y. Aiyub. 2012. “NEGOTIATING ACEH SELF-DETERMINATION IN INDONESIA’S UNITARY SYSTEM: A Study on Peace Agreement Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding 2005.” Aceh International Journal of Social Sciences 1(2):63–76.
Kingsbury, Damien. 2005. “A Mechanism to End Conflict in Aceh.” Security Challenges 1(1):73–88.
Kingsbury, Damien. 2007. “The Free Aceh Movement: Islam and Democratisation.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 37(2). doi: 10.1080/00472330701253759.
Kingsbury, Damien. 2017. Politics in Contemporary Southeast Asia. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
Lee, Terence. 2020. “Political Orders and Peace-Building: Ending the Aceh Conflict.” Conflict, Security and Development 20(1):115–39. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2019.1705071.
Neuman, W. Lawrenc. Lawrence. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2014. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. United States of America: Pearson.
Nurhasim, Moch. 2007. “Strategi Penyelesaian Konflik Aceh.” Jurnal Demokrasi & HAM 7(2):46–68.
Ridder, Hans Gerd, Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Vol. 28.
Törnquist, Olle, Stanley Adi Prasetyo, and Teresa Birks. 2010. Aceh: The Role of Democracy for Peace and Reconstruction. Yogyakarta: PCD Press Indonesia.